ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pre- and Post-Procedural Considerations and Thread Types for Thread Lifting.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and Predictors of Complications After Polydioxanone Thread Lift: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Parameters Determining the Pull-Out Strength of Poly(L-Lactide-Co-ε-Caprolactone) Barbed Suspension Threads: A Comparative ex vivo Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Predictors of Dissatisfaction After Polydioxanone Thread Lift: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Anatomical Consideration for Double Chin Thread Lifting.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- The Rise and Refinement of Breast Thread Lifting: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Synergistic facial rejuvenation with PDO threads and Botulinum Toxin A for aging skin.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial thread lifting has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional face-lifting procedures, with particular emphasis on U-shaped and I-shaped barbed threads. This review analyzes the anatomical considerations, procedural techniques, and clinical outcomes of different thread types for facial rejuvenation. The study examines the mechanical principles and lifting mechanisms of U-shaped "suspension type" threads versus I-shaped threads, highlighting their distinct characteristics and applications. The results indicate that U-shaped threads provide strong lifting effects, with success rates reported at 85-90% in achieving visible tissue elevation when anchored in the temporal area. However, these threads carry higher risks of complications, including bleeding (15-20%), dimpling (12-18%), and tissue damage at exit points (5-10%). In contrast, I-shaped threads demonstrate advantages in minimizing tissue trauma and patient discomfort, with complication rates below 5%, though they may provide less dramatic lifting effects. The study concludes that optimal outcomes are achieved through careful patient selection and customized combination approaches rather than reliance on a single thread type. Future directions point toward the development of hybrid techniques that combine the strengths of both thread types to maximize efficacy while minimizing complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.