ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Unique Subclavian Vascular Ring Anomaly: Insights from CT Angiography.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic arch anomalies represent a range of congenital vascular malformations resulting from disruptions in the typical embryological development of the aortic arch and its branches. These anomalies, which vary widely in their presentation, can lead to significant clinical symptoms depending on their structure and position. We report the case of a 75-year-old male with intermittent hypertension, palpitations, and episodic warmth in the upper body. Computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed an atypical aortic arch anatomy with a unique right subclavian artery anomaly. The aortic arch displayed a typical orientation but included an additional arterial branch arising from the medial wall of the descending aorta. This aberrant branch with a tortuous aspect coursed posteriorly around the esophagus and merged with the subclavian branch of the brachiocephalic trunk, forming a vascular ring. A possible embryological hypothesis requires the persistence of both the distal segment of the right dorsal aorta and the right seventh intersegmental artery, as well as the right fourth aortic arch; however, the imaging aspect of our patient is not that of a classic double aortic arch. This case emphasizes the importance of advanced imaging techniques, such as CT angiography, in identifying and managing rare vascular anomalies that may influence patient care and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.