Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859912›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Mechanical Behavior of PEEK and PMMA Graphene and Ti6Al4V Implant-Supported Frameworks: In Silico Study.

Mariano Herrero-Climent, Fernando Sanchez-Lasheras, Jordi Martinez-Lopez, Javier Gil, Aritza Brizuela-Velasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariano Herrero-ClimentPorto Dental Institute, Av. De Montevideo 810, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3284-1528
Fernando Sanchez-LasherasUniversity Institute of Space Sciences and Technologies of Asturias (ICTEA), University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7052-2811
Jordi Martinez-LopezSoadco Research and Development Department, AD700 Escaldes, Andorra.
Javier GilBiomimetics Oral Biomaterials and Interfaces (BOBI), Department Ciencia e Ingeniería de Matariales, Escola d'Enginyeria Barcelona Est, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, c/Eduard Maristany 16, 08029 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-1412
Aritza Brizuela-VelascoDENS-ia Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Miguel de Cervantes European University, C/del Padre Julio Chevalier 2, 47012 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-3863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative analysis has been carried out between three different dental materials suitable for the prostheses manufacturing. The analysis performed is based on the finite elements method (FEM) and was made to evaluate their performance under three different loading conditions. Three different materials were modeled with 3D CAD geometry, all of them suitable to be simulated by means of a linear elastic model. The materials employed were graphene polymethyl methacrylate (G-PMMA) with 0.25% of graphene, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and Ti6Al4V. Three loading conditions have been defined: distal, medial, and central. In all cases under study, the load was applied progressively, 5 N by 5 N until a previously fixed threshold of 25 N was reached, which always ensures that work is carried out in the elastic zone. The behavior of G-PMMA and PEEK in the tests performed is similar. Regarding maximum deformations in the model, it has been found that deformations are higher in the G-PMMA models when compared to those made of PEEK. The highest values of maximum stress according to the von Mises criteria are achieved in models made of Ti6Al4V, followed by G-PMMA and PEEK. G-PMMA is more prone to plastic deformations compared to Ti6Al4V. However, due to its relatively higher stiffness compared to other common polymers, G-PMMA is able to withstand moderate stress levels before significant deformation occurs, placing it in the intermediate position between Ti6Al4V and PEEK in terms of stress capacity. It should be noted that there is also a difference in the results obtained depending on the applied load, whether distal, medial, or central, proving that, in all simulations, it is the distal test that offers the worst results in terms of presenting a higher value for both displacement and tension. The results obtained allow us to identify the advantages and limitations of each material in terms of structural strength, mechanical behavior, and adaptability to loading conditions that simulate realistic scenarios.

Indexed as

finite element simulationG-PMMAimplant-supported frameworksPEEKTi6Al4V

Identifiers

PMID39859912
PMCPMC11767088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.