Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859901›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

UHPC Viability for Nuclear Storage Facilities: Synthesis and Critical Review of Durability, Thermal, and Nuclear Properties for Informed Mix Modifications.

Nataliia Igrashkina, Mohamed A Moustafa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nataliia IgrashkinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Mohamed A MoustafaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1006-7685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from the United States' nuclear power plants has been placed in dry cask storage systems since the 1980s. Due to the lack of a clear path for permanent geological repository for SNF, consolidated and long-term storage solutions that use durable concrete and avoid current aging and licensing challenges are becoming indispensable. Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is a rapidly growing advanced concrete solution with superior mechanical and durability properties that can help realize future resilient nuclear storage facilities. Thus, the overall goal of this review study is to demonstrate the viability of UHPC as a long-term solution for future nuclear storage facilities. The paper first identifies all possible non-nuclear (environmental) and nuclear (thermal and radiation-induced) degradation mechanisms in concrete overpacks and storage modules with critical assessment and projections on UHPC performance in comparison to current conventional concrete solutions. Next, since concrete serves as a shielding material in nuclear settings, the preliminary attenuation properties of UHPC from emerging studies are synthesized along with the possible mix modifications to improve its attenuation performance. The paper identifies the major knowledge gaps to inform future research and development, aimed at rethinking the design of SNF dry storage facilities by incorporating UHPC.

Indexed as

concrete degradation mechanismsnuclear damageradiation attenuationUHPC

Identifiers

PMID39859901
PMCPMC11766686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.