Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859878›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Can the Dimensional Optimisation of 3D FDM-Manufactured Parts Be a Solution for a Correct Design?

Adrian Neacșa, Alin Diniță, Ștefan Virgil Iacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrian NeacșaMechanical and Electrical Faculty, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6192-9441
Alin DinițăMechanical and Electrical Faculty, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-9431
Ștefan Virgil IacobIndustrial Engineering and Robotics Faculty, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Spl. Independentei 303, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5831-203X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing technology, also known as 3D printing, has emerged as a viable alternative in modern manufacturing processes. Unlike traditional manufacturing methods, which often involve complex mechanical operations that can lead to errors and inconsistencies in the final product, additive technology offers a new approach that enables precise layer-by-layer production with improved geometric accuracy, reduced material consumption and increased design flexibility. Geometrical accuracy is a critical issue in industries such as aerospace, automotive, medicine and consumer goods, hence the importance of the following question: can the dimensional optimisation of 3D FDM-manufactured parts be a solution for correct design? This paper presents a complex study of model parts printed from four common polymers used in fused deposition modelling (FDM) additive technology, namely ABS (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene), PLA (polylactic acid), HIPS (high-impact polystyrene) and PETG (polyethylene terephthalate glycol). The results of the methodology used highlight the dimensional changes that need to be made at the design stage, depending on the direction of printing and the type of geometric elements in the final part.

Indexed as

3D printingcompliant productsdesigngeometric accuracypolymers

Identifiers

PMID39859878
PMCPMC11766861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.