ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Study on Hyperelastic Constitutive Models for the Static and Dynamic Behavior of Resilient Mounts.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperelastic Cardiovascular NN-FE: A Framework for Integrating Nonlinear Finite Element Solvers with Neural Networks for the Hyperelastic Modeling of Cardiac Valve Tissue.Research square · 2026Article
- Impact of Structural Stiffness on Vibration Periods of Concrete Buildings: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Resilient mounts play a vital role in anti-vibration and shock-absorption systems, making precise estimation of their static and dynamic stiffness essential for ensuring optimal mechanical performance and effective design. This study investigates the behavior of resilient mounts by analyzing their static and dynamic stiffness characteristics through the application of various hyperelastic constitutive models. Seven hyperelastic models were reviewed and systematically compared using numerical simulations, experimental data, and analytical solutions. The model parameters were calibrated and optimized based on experimental results obtained from quasi-static loading tests, including tension, compression, and shear conditions. Additionally, frequency response simulations were employed to evaluate the dynamic behavior of the resilient mounts under varying preload scenarios. The results provide practical insights into the performance of hyperelastic models and offer a comprehensive guideline for selecting suitable models for resilient mount applications, contributing to improved accuracy in both static and dynamic performance predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.