Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859763›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Critical Review of the Decarbonisation Potential in the U.K. Cement Industry.

Ziyad Sherif, Shoaib Sarfraz, Mark Jolly, Konstantinos Salonitis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ziyad SherifSustainable Manufacturing Systems Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8137-1695
Shoaib SarfrazSustainable Manufacturing Systems Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-2054
Mark JollySustainable Manufacturing Systems Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-3584
Konstantinos SalonitisSustainable Manufacturing Systems Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1059-364X

Funding

EPSRC EP/V054627/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As urbanisation and infrastructure development continue to drive rising cement demand, the imperative to significantly reduce emissions from this emissions-intensive sector has become increasingly urgent, especially in the context of global climate goals such as achieving net zero emissions by 2050. This review examines the status, challenges and prospects of low-carbon cement technologies and mitigation strategies through the lens of the U.K. cement industry. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining structured literature searches across academic databases with analyses of industry reports, market data and technological roadmaps to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Following an outline of cement production, resource flows and the sector's landscape in the U.K., the review delves into an array of decarbonisation pathways. This includes deploying the best available technologies (BATs), fuel switching, carbon capture utilisation and storage (CCUS), clinker substitution and low-carbon cement formulations. A critical assessment is provided on the technological readiness, costs, resource availability considerations and scalability aspects governing the widespread implementation prospects of these approaches within the U.K. cement industry. Furthermore, this study proposes a roadmap that considers priority avenues and policy needs essential for facilitating the transition towards sustainable cement production aligned with the U.K.'s net zero obligations by 2050. This evaluation contributes significantly to the ongoing decarbonisation discourse by holistically mapping technological solutions and strategic imperatives tailored to the unique challenges and opportunities presented by the U.K. cement sector.

Indexed as

cementitious materialsCO2 emissionsdecarbonisationenergygreen cementU.K. cement industry

Identifiers

PMID39859763
PMCPMC11766818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.