ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing Structural Reinforcement in 3D-Printed Concrete: Current Methods, Challenges, and Innovations.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Meso-Scale Computational Framework for Predicting Fracture Mechanisms in 3D-Printed Bouligand Cementitious Metamaterials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Effect of Glass and Carbon Fiber Mesh on 3D-Printed Concrete Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rheological Optimization of 3D-Printed Cementitious Materials Using Response Surface Methodology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Bagworm-Inspired Robot That Acquires Its Exterior from External Environments.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With rapid global urbanization and economic development, 3D concrete printing (3DCP) technology has emerged as an innovative construction method, garnering increasing attention and application. Compared to traditional construction techniques, 3DCP not only reduces resource waste and carbon emissions during the building process but also significantly enhances construction efficiency, demonstrating considerable potential in the construction industry. As 3DCP advances from theoretical studies to real-world applications, providing stable and reliable structural reinforcement solutions becomes essential. This paper focuses on examining various methods to improve the performance of 3D-printed concrete (3DPC) structures. The analysis shows that reinforcement using steel bars, in combination with other materials (mainly fibers and nanomaterials), remains a key strategy for structural enhancement. By integrating diverse reinforcement methods, this study proposes an innovative bidirectional steel mesh layout scheme. Additionally, given the unique nature of 3DPC construction, a critical review of various methods for improving interface bonding strength is included. These findings aim to guide the engineering community in selecting suitable reinforcement solutions for 3DPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.