ArticleInsects2025
Characterizing Stream Condition with Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Southeastern Minnesota, USA: Agriculture, Channelization, and Karst Geology Impact Lotic Habitats and Communities.
Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Prior to implementing watershed-wide projects to reduce the impacts of agriculture on regional streams and rivers, stream habitats and benthic aquatic macroinvertebrate communities were assessed at 15 sites on the South Branch Root River and its major tributaries in southeastern Minnesota, USA. Triplicate kick-net samples were collected from each site during three time periods (1998, 1999, 2006/2008) and stream habitats were inventoried within 150 m long sections at each site. In total, 26,760 invertebrates representing 84 taxa were collected and used to rate stream sites using a regional multi-metric benthic index of biotic integrity (BIBI). BIBI scores were significantly correlated with total invertebrate taxa richness. BIBI ratings improved from poor and very poor at headwater sites in channelized stream sections draining agricultural lands to fair to good to excellent in downstream sections flowing through natural channels in largely forested lands. Fifty percent of samples rated stream sites as poor or very poor. Over 85% of stream habitat assessments indicated the presence of fair to good habitats, although stream sites were relatively wide and shallow and dominated by fine sediments that also embedded coarser substrates. BIBI metrics and scores were strongly positively correlated with pool area, riffle spacing-to-stream width ratios, and silt-free substrate, and negatively correlated with width-to-depth ratios. Most stream sites had few Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, and Diptera taxa and too few intolerant taxa. It is expected that benthic invertebrate communities should improve as more riparian buffers are added along all streams. However, on-going channel maintenance activities in headwater stream sections, mandated to encourage drainage of adjacent agricultural fields, will continue to negatively impact headwater habitats and biotic communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.