Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859583›Full record

ArticleInsects2024

The Impact of Oxford Nanopore Technologies Based Methodologies on the Genome Sequencing and Assembly of Romanian Strains of

Attila Cristian Ratiu, Adrian Ionascu, Nicoleta Denisa Constantin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Attila Cristian RatiuDrosophila Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0534-1464
Adrian IonascuDrosophila Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4451-7928
Nicoleta Denisa ConstantinDrosophila Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1894-2488

Funding

University of Bucharest
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsWe implemented both MinION and Flongle flow-cells and tested the impact of various basecalling models and assembly strategies on the quality of the sought-after representative genome assemblies.

resultsWe demonstrate that the sup-basecalling model significantly improved the read quality and that adding a relatively small collection of reads had a significant positive impact over the assembly quality. The novel dScaff bioinformatics prototype tool allowed us to perform sequence-level quality tests, as well as to represent assembly selections and display both the contig redundancy and the repeats-enriched genomic sub-sequences. Moreover, we used dScaff to propose a minimal assembly variant corresponding to one of our lines, GB-ls-coga4, which assured a basic linear coverage of the genome and exhibited quality parameters comparable with those particular to the current reference genome assembly.

conclusionsThe study presents the first sequencing and assembly of a

Indexed as

Drosophila suzukiigenome assemblygenome scaffoldingnatural populationONT sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39859583
PMCPMC11766098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.