ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Improving Replication in Endometrial Omics: Understanding the Influence of the Menstrual Cycle.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodological Pitfalls in Endometriosis Biospecimen Research: Lessons From MAP4K4 Expression Studies.FASEB bioAdvances · 2026Article
- Dynamic Transcriptomic Profiling of Mouse Endometrium Across the Estrous Cycle Reveals Phase-Specific Regulatory Networks Underlying Cyclic Remodelling.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Translational Assessment of Omics Approaches in Endometriosis: Bridging Molecular Discovery with Clinical Utility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamic nature of human endometrial tissue presents unique challenges in analysis. Despite extensive research into endometrial disorders such as endometriosis and infertility, recent systematic reviews have highlighted concerning issues with the reproducibility of omics studies attempting to identify biomarkers. This review examines factors contributing to poor reproducibility in endometrial omics research. Hormonal fluctuations in the menstrual cycle lead to widespread molecular changes in the endometrium, most notably in gene expression profiles. In this review, we examine the variability in omics data due to the menstrual cycle and highlight the importance of accurate menstrual cycle dating for effective statistical modelling. The current standards of endometrial dating lack precision and we make the case for using molecular-based modelling methods to estimate menstrual cycle time for endometrium tissue samples. Additionally, we discuss statistical considerations such as confounding and interaction effects, as well as the importance of recording the detailed and accurate clinical information of patients. By addressing these methodological challenges, we aim to establish more robust and reproducible research practises, increasing the reliability of endometrial omics research and biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.