Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859516›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Exosomal Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Response.

Yameen Hamid, Rukhshana Dina Rabbani, Rakkan Afsara, Samarea Nowrin, Aruni Ghose, Vasileios Papadopoulos, Konstantinos Sirlantzis, Saak V Ovsepian, Stergios Boussios

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. PeerJ · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yameen HamidThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-7746
Rukhshana Dina RabbaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-9504
Rakkan AfsaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Evercare Hospital, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-9320-2693
Samarea NowrinDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone ME16 9QQ, UK.
Aruni GhoseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-8033
Vasileios PapadopoulosDepartment of Urology, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury CT1 3NG, UK.
Konstantinos SirlantzisSchool of Engineering, Technology and Design, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury CT1 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0847-8880
Saak V OvsepianFaculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich London, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9522-4159
Stergios BoussiosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-6131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among men, often presents challenges in accurate diagnosis and effective monitoring. This systematic review explores the potential of exosomal biomolecules as noninvasive biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response of prostate cancer. A thorough systematic literature search through online public databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science) using structured search terms and screening using predefined eligibility criteria resulted in 137 studies that we analyzed in this systematic review. We evaluated the findings from these clinical studies, revealing that the load of exosomes in the blood and urine of prostate cancer patients, which includes microRNAs (miRNAs), proteins, and lipids, demonstrates disease-specific changes. It also shows that some exosomal markers can differentiate between malignant and benign hyperplasia of the prostate, predict disease aggressiveness, and monitor treatment efficacy. Notably, miRNA emerged as the most frequently studied biomolecule, demonstrating superior diagnostic potential compared to traditional methods like prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. The analysis also highlights the pressing need for a standardised analytic approach through multi-centre studies to validate the full potential of exosomal biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorExosomesProstatic NeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMicroRNAsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsbiomarkersexosomesliquid biopsymiRNAprognosisprostate cancerresponse

Identifiers

PMID39859516
PMCPMC11765602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.