ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Potential of Trilayered Gelatin/Polycaprolactone Nanofibers for Periodontal Regeneration: An In Vitro Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of the epithelial regeneration capacities of two biomaterials in vitro.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few years, biomaterial-based periodontal tissue engineering has gained popularity. An ideal biomaterial for treating periodontal defects is expected to stimulate periodontal-derived cells, allowing them to contribute most efficiently to tissue reconstruction. The present study focuses on evaluating the in vitro behavior of human periodontal ligament-derived stromal cells (hPDL-MSCs) when cultured on gelatin/Polycaprolactone prototype (GPP) and volume-stable collagen matrix (VSCM). Cells were cultured onto the GPP, VSCM, or tissue culture plate (TCP) for 3, 7, and 14 days. Cell morphology, adhesion, proliferation/viability, the gene expression of Collagen type I, alpha1 (COL1A1), Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), Periostin (POSTN), Cementum protein 1 (CEMP1), Cementum attachment protein (CAP), Interleukin 8 (IL-8) and Osteocalcin (OCN), and the levels of VEGF-A and IL-8 proteins were investigated. hPDL-MSCs attached to both biomaterials exhibited a different morphology compared to TCP. GPP exhibited stronger capabilities in enhancing cell viability and metabolic activity compared to VSCM. In most cases, the expression of all investigated genes, except POSTN, was stimulated by both materials, with GPP having a superior effect on COL1A1 and VEGF-A, and VSCM on OCN. The IL-8 protein production was slightly higher in cells grown on VSCM. GPP also exhibited the ability to absorb VEGF-A protein. The gene expression of POSTN was promoted by GPP and slightly suppressed by VSCM. In summary, our findings indicate that GPP electrospun nanofibers effectively promote the functional performance of PDLSCs in periodontal regeneration, particularly in the periodontal ligament and cementum compartment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.