ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Bypass of Methoxyamine-Adducted Abasic Sites by Eukaryotic Translesion DNA Polymerases.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opposing regulation by Rev1 of DNA polymerase zeta activity on damaged versus undamaged DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Opposing regulation by Rev1 of DNA polymerase zeta activity on damaged versus undamaged DNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The apurinic/apyrimidinic site (AP site) is a highly mutagenic and cytotoxic DNA lesion. Normally, AP sites are removed from DNA by base excision repair (BER). Methoxyamine (MOX), a BER inhibitor currently under clinical trials as a tumor sensitizer, forms adducts with AP sites (AP-MOX) resistant to the key BER enzyme, AP endonuclease. As AP-MOX remains unrepaired, translesion DNA synthesis is expected to be the main mechanism of cellular response to this lesion. However, the mutagenic potential of AP-MOX is still unclear. Here, we compare the blocking and mutagenic properties of AP-MOX and the natural AP site for major eukaryotic DNA polymerases involved in translesion synthesis: DNA polymerases η, ι, ζ, Rev1, and primase-polymerase PrimPol. The miscoding properties of both abasic lesions remained mostly the same for each studied enzyme. In contrast, the blocking properties of AP-MOX compared to the AP site were DNA polymerase specific. Pol η and PrimPol bypassed both lesions with the same efficiency. The bypass of AP-MOX by Pol ι was 15-fold lower than that of the AP site. On the contrary, Rev1 bypassed AP-MOX 5-fold better than the AP site. Together, our data suggest that Rev1 is best suited to support synthesis across AP-MOX in human cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.