Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859052›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

New Trends and Future Perspectives in the Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Mourmouris Panagiotis, Georgopoulos Ioannis, Klapsis Vasilleios, Pisiotis Nikolaos, Salmas Ioannis, Charamoglis Sotirios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mourmouris PanagiotisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.
Georgopoulos IoannisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.
Klapsis VasilleiosUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.
Pisiotis NikolaosUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.
Salmas IoannisUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.
Charamoglis SotiriosUrology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Neo Faliro, 18547 Piraeus, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high incidence of bladder cancer (it represents the 7th most common cancer in males), EAU guidelines do not recommend any technique for screening and prevention, whereas the main diagnostic tools remain computed tomography urography (CTU), cytology, and cystoscopy. Unfortunately, these gold-standard modalities are mainly characterized by low sensitivity and accuracy. To minimize the limitations and increase the detection rates of urothelial cancer, several technologies have been developed. In our review, we summarize all the available data concerning the contemporary technological novelties that include imaging, cytology, and endoscopic techniques in pursuit of finding the optimal combination of diagnostic tools that can provide better detection accuracy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystoscopyHumansMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrographybiomarkersbladder cancercytologydiagnosisendoscopyimagingupper urinary tract cancerurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39859052
PMCPMC11767069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.