Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859042›Full record

SynthesisMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Comparison of Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis from KSER Update Series.

Do Kyung Kim, Young Joon Moon, Doo Yong Chung, Hae Do Jung, Seung Hyun Jeon, Seok Ho Kang, Sunghyun Paick, Joo Yong Lee, Korean Society of Endourology and Robotics (KSER) Research Committee

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative StudyNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Anesthesia for robot-assisted surgery].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Do Kyung KimDepartment of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.
Young Joon MoonDepartment of Urology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul 07804, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4711-772X
Doo Yong ChungDepartment of Urology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Hae Do JungDepartment of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Ilsan 10380, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hyun JeonDepartment of Urology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Seok Ho KangDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Sunghyun PaickDepartment of Urology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6010-3277
Joo Yong LeeDepartment of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3470-1767
Korean Society of Endourology and Robotics (KSER) Research Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresBayes TheoremHumansMaleTreatment Outcomelaparoscopynetwork meta-analysisprostatectomyprostatic neoplasmsrobotics

Identifiers

PMID39859042
PMCPMC11766646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.