Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39859003›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Challenges and Innovations in Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review on Materials, Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Diana Marian, Giuseppe Toro, Giovanbattista D'Amico, Maria Consiglia Trotta, Michele D'Amico, Alexandru Petre, Ioana Lile, Anca Hermenean, Anca Fratila

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Chondrogenic Potential of Periosteum-Derived Cells.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diana MarianDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, "Vasile Goldiș" Western University of Arad, 94-96 Revolutiei Blvd., 310025 Arad, Romania.
Giuseppe ToroMultidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-721X
Giovanbattista D'AmicoSchool of Geriatrics, University of Studies of L'Aquila, 67010 L'Aquila, Italy.
Maria Consiglia TrottaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-5955
Michele D'AmicoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6899-0595
Alexandru PetreDepartment of Prosthodontics, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5994-0000
Ioana LileDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, "Vasile Goldiș" Western University of Arad, 94-96 Revolutiei Blvd., 310025 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-6347-3497
Anca Hermenean"Aurel Ardelean" Institute of Life Sciences, "Vasile Goldiș" Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-6653
Anca FratilaDepartment of Dental Medicine and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-6755

Funding

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples - Italy STEMBIONEC project, 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the recent advancements and ongoing challenges in regenerating alveolar bone, which is essential for dental implants and periodontal health. It examines traditional techniques like guided bone regeneration and bone grafting, alongside newer methods such as stem cell therapy, gene therapy, and 3D bioprinting. Each approach is considered for its strengths in supporting bone growth and integration, especially in cases where complex bone defects make regeneration difficult. This review also looks at different biomaterials, from bioactive scaffolds to nanomaterials, assessing how well they encourage cell growth and healing. Personalized treatments, like customized 3D-printed scaffolds, show promise in enhancing bone formation and tissue compatibility. Additionally, signaling molecules, like bone morphogenetic proteins, play a crucial role in guiding the process of bone formation and remodeling. Despite these advances, challenges remain-particularly with severe bone loss and with refining biomaterials for more reliable, long-term outcomes. This review proposes combining advanced materials, regenerative technologies, and personalized approaches to achieve more effective and consistent outcomes in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessBone RegenerationGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalAlveolar Bone LossBiocompatible MaterialsHumansTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materialsalveolar bone regenerationbiomaterialsguided bone regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39859003
PMCPMC11766548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.