Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39858923›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Benefits of Immobilized Bacteria in Bioremediation of Sites Contaminated with Toxic Organic Compounds.

Emanuel Gheorghita Armanu, Simone Bertoldi, Łukasz Chrzanowski, Irina Volf, Hermann J Heipieper, Christian Eberlein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emanuel Gheorghita ArmanuDepartment of Molecular Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-6724-0814
Simone BertoldiDepartment of Molecular Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-6101-4127
Łukasz ChrzanowskiInstitute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2171-4913
Irina VolfDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Management, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 73A Prof. D. Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-937X
Hermann J HeipieperDepartment of Molecular Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3723-9600
Christian EberleinDepartment of Molecular Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4521-8145

Funding

Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association KA2-HSC-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although bioremediation is considered the most environmentally friendly and sustainable technique for remediating contaminated soil and water, it is most effective when combined with physicochemical methods, which allow for the preliminary removal of large quantities of pollutants. This allows microorganisms to efficiently eliminate the remaining contaminants. In addition to requiring the necessary genes and degradation pathways for specific substrates, as well as tolerance to adverse environmental conditions, microorganisms may perform below expectations. One typical reason for this is the high toxicity of xenobiotics present in large concentrations, stemming from the vulnerability of bacteria introduced to a contaminated site. This is especially true for planktonic bacteria, whereas bacteria within biofilms or microcolonies have significant advantages over their planktonic counterparts. A physical matrix is essential for the formation, maintenance, and survival of bacterial biofilms. By providing such a matrix for bacterial immobilization, the formation of biofilms can be facilitated and accelerated. Therefore, bioremediation combined with bacterial immobilization offers a comprehensive solution for environmental cleanup by harnessing the specialized metabolic activities of microorganisms while ensuring their retention and efficacy at target sites. In many cases, such bioremediation can also eliminate the need for physicochemical methods that are otherwise required to initially reduce contaminant concentrations. Then, it will be possible to use microorganisms for the remediation of higher concentrations of xenobiotics, significantly reducing costs while maintaining a rapid rate of remediation processes. This review explores the benefits of bacterial immobilization, highlighting materials and processes for developing an optimal immobilization matrix. It focuses on the following four key areas: (i) the types of organic pollutants impacting environmental and human health, (ii) the bacterial strains used in bioremediation processes, (iii) the types and benefits of immobilization, and (iv) the immobilization of bacterial cells on various carriers for targeted pollutant degradation.

Indexed as

biodegradationBTEXcontaminants of emerging concernmicrobial immobilizationmicrocoloniesnano-pollutantspolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonssolvent tolerancesupport materials

Identifiers

PMID39858923
PMCPMC11768004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.