ReviewMicromachines2024
A Comparative Review: Biological Safety and Sustainability of Metal Nanomaterials Without and with Machine Learning Assistance.
Review in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermostability Engineering in Therapeutic Antioxidant Enzymes: From Molecular Fundamentals to Oxidative Stress Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Applied Nanobiotechnology for Vector-borne Disease Management: Drug Delivery, Diagnostics, and Sustainable Vector Control.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Hyperbranched Polymer Dendrimers Embedded in Electrospun Nanofibers for Safe and Sustainable Antibacterial Filtration Materials.Polymers · 2026Article
- Vitamin-Conjugated Metallic Nanoparticles: Applications for Antimicrobial and Anti-Cancer Drug Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology in Orthopedic Care: Advances in Drug Delivery, Implants, and Biocompatibility Considerations.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Green carbon dots in the era of AI: sustainable synthesis, intelligent drug delivery, advanced diagnostics, and bioimaging.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, metal nanomaterials and nanoproducts have been developed intensively, and they are now widely applied across various sectors, including energy, aerospace, agriculture, industry, and biomedicine. However, nanomaterials have been identified as potentially toxic, with the toxicity of metal nanoparticles posing significant risks to both human health and the environment. Therefore, the toxicological risk assessment of metal nanomaterials is essential to identify and mitigate potential adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the safety and sustainability of metallic nanoparticles (such as Au NPs, Ag NPs, etc.) in key domains such as medicine, energy, and environmental protection. Using a dual-perspective analysis approach, it highlights the unique advantages of machine learning in data processing, predictive modeling, and optimization. At the same time, it underscores the importance of traditional methods, particularly their ability to offer greater interpretability and more intuitive results in specific contexts. Finally, a comparative analysis of traditional methods and machine learning techniques for detecting the toxicity of metal nanomaterials is presented, emphasizing the key challenges that need to be addressed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.