ArticleMicromachines2024
In Vitro Model of Vascular Remodeling Under Microfluidic Perfusion.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in In Vitro Vascularization of Engineered Tissues: From Microvessel Formation to Hepatic Tissue Integration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- A Dynamic 3D Human Liver Sinusoid Model for Mechanistic Interrogation of Fontan-Associated Liver Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Building the framework for bioprinted human heart tissue: recent developments and future prospects.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Long-term physiological flow rescues regressed microvascular networks and increases their longevity.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a portable microfluidic system that combines spontaneous lumen formation from human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs) in fibrin-collagen hydrogels with active perfusion controlled by a braille actuator. Adaptive interstitial flow and feedthrough perfusion switching enabled the successful culture of spontaneously formed naturally branched lumens for more than one month. We obtained many large-area (2 mm × 3 mm) long-term (more than 30 days per run) time-lapse image datasets of the in vitro luminal network using this microfluidic system. We also developed an automatic image analysis pipeline to extract the morphology of the lumen network and node-edge network structure weighted with segmentwise flow parameters. The automatic lumen area measurements revealed that almost all lumens were successfully cultured in this system for approximately 50 days, following the meshwork, sprouting, remodeling, stability, and erosion stages. We found that the optimization of the lumen network during the remodeling stage can be explained by the decrease in the betweenness centrality of the WSS-weighted network and the increase in the strength centrality of the flow-rate-weighted network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.