ReviewGenes2025
22q11.21 Deletions: A Review on the Interval Mediated by Low-Copy Repeats C and D.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Novel Variants and Clinical Heterogeneity in Pediatric Calcium Metabolism Disorders Identified Through High-Yield Tiered Genetic Testing in a Taiwanese Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
22q11.2 is a region prone to chromosomal rearrangements due to the presence of eight large blocks of low-copy repeats (LCR22s). The 3 Mb 22q11.2 "typical deletion", between LCR22-A and D, causes a fairly well-known clinical picture, while the effects of smaller CNVs harbored in this interval are still to be fully elucidated. Nested deletions, flanked by LCR22B-D, LCR22B-C, or LCR22C-D, are very rare and are collectively described as "central deletions". The LCR22C-D deletion (CDdel) has never been separately analyzed. In this paper, we focused only on CDdel, evaluating its gene content and reviewing the literature and public databases in order to obtain new insights for the classification of this CNV. At first glance, CDdels are associated with a broad phenotypic spectrum, ranging from clinically normal to quite severe phenotypes. However, the frequency of specific clinical traits highlights that renal/urinary tract abnormalities, cardiac defects, and neurological/behavioral disorders are much more common in CDdel than in the general population. This frequency is too high to be fortuitous, indicating that CDdel is a predisposing factor for these phenotypic traits. Among the genes present in this interval,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.