ReviewGenes2025
Liquid Biopsy and Challenge of Assay Heterogeneity for Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Colon Cancer Treatment.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of liquid biopsy in the molecular characterization of HPV-related cancers.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Metastatic Odyssey: Decoding the Genomic Journey from Primary Colorectal Cancer to Disseminated Disease.Cancers · 2026Review
- Monitoring of plasma and urine tumor-derived DNA to inform bladder-sparing approaches for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Monitoring of plasma and urine tumor-derived DNA to inform bladder-sparing approaches for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of FFPE tissues: progress, limitations, and clinical translation barriers.Clinical proteomics · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Navigating the Landscape of Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Circulating tumor DNA to monitor treatment response in solid tumors and advance precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Unveiling the dual role of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review of biomarker utility and immune microenvironment crosstalk.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving role of minimal residual disease (MRD) for patients with Colon Cancer (CC). Currently, the standard of care for patients with non-metastatic CC is adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for all patients with stage III and high-risk stage II CC following surgical intervention. Despite a 5-20% improvement in long-term survival outcomes, this approach also results in a significant proportion of patients receiving ACT without any therapeutic benefit and being unnecessarily exposed to the risks of secondary side effects. This underscores an unmet clinical need for more precise stratification to distinguish patients who necessitate ACT from those who can be treated with surgery alone. By employing liquid biopsy, it is possible to discern MRD enabling the categorization of patients as MRD-positive or MRD-negative, potentially revolutionizing the management of ACT. This review aimed to examine the heterogeneity of methodologies currently available for MRD detection, encompassing the state-of-the-art technologies, their respective advantages, limitations, and the technological challenges and multi-omic approaches that can be utilized to enhance assay performance. Furthermore, a discussion was held regarding the clinical trials that employ an MRD assay focusing on the heterogeneity of the assays used. These differences in methodology, target selection, and performance risk producing inconsistent results that may not solely reflect biological/clinical differences but may be the consequence of the preferential use of particular products in studies conducted in different countries. Standardization and harmonization of MRD assays will be crucial to ensure the liquid revolution delivers reliable and clinically actionable outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.