ReviewBiomolecules2025
Immunological Regulation of Fibrosis During Heart Failure: It Takes Two to Tango.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart Failure with Reduced versus Preserved Ejection Fraction: Molecular Mechanisms, Immunologic Pathways, Current Therapies, and Future Directions.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Slick K+ channels contribute to cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, and dysfunction in postinfarction hearts.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Impaired antigen clearance of macrophages associates with heart failure and non-obstructive azoospermia: insights from transcriptomics, in silico knockout, andFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of the lactate-to-albumin ratio in critically ill chronic heart failure patients with sepsis: insights from a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immuno-fibrotic networks and their protein mediators, such as cytokines and chemokines, have increasingly been appreciated for their critical role in cardiac healing and fibrosis during cardiomyopathy. Immune activation, trafficking, and extravasation are tightly regulated to ensure a targeted and effective response against non-self antigens/pathogens while preserving tolerance towards self-antigens and coordinate fibrotic responses for efficient scar formation, a distinction that is severely compromised during chronic diseases. It is clear that immune cells are not only the critical regulators of post-infarct healing and scarring but are also the key players in regulating fibroblast activation during left-ventricular (LV) remodeling. Incomplete resolution coupled with sustained low-grade inflammation during dilated cardiomyopathy precipitates a "frustrated" immune cell response resulting in unconstrained pro-fibrotic and pro-hypertrophic signaling to induce maladaptive structural and functional changes in the myocardium. The aims of this review are to (i) briefly summarize the role of key immune cells that regulate wound healing during MI and fibrosis during LV remodeling; (ii) underscore phenotypic diversities in immune cells and their subsets to underscore their role in regulating fibrotic responses, and, last but not the least, (iii) highlight gaps in our understanding that restrict the translation of immuno-modulatory therapies from the preclinical models to heart failure patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.