Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39858214›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Conspicuous Animals Remain Alert When Under Cover but Do Not Differ in the Temporal Course of Vigilance from Less Conspicuous Species.

Gerhard Hofmann, Claudia Mettke-Hofmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gouldian Finches (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gerhard HofmannIndependent Researcher, Moreton CH46, UK.
Claudia Mettke-HofmannSchool of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3874-5035

Funding

Akademie für Vogelhaltung no numberEstrilda no numberEthologische Gesellschaft no numberGesellschaft für Arterhaltende Vogelzucht no numberGesellschaft für Tropenornithologie no numberSave the Gouldian Fund no numberVereinigung für Artenschutz, Vogelhaltung und Vogelzucht no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conspicuousness increases the risk of predation. One strategy to reduce this risk is to increase vigilance. We investigated the frequency of head movements as a measure of vigilance at waterholes in two related songbird species that differed in their conspicuousness: the Gouldian finch and the long-tailed finch. While both species showed a high frequency of head movements (high vigilance) when sitting in an open tree, the more colourful Gouldian finch remained more vigilant than the less conspicuous long-tailed finch when sitting under cover. Moreover, juvenile Gouldian finches had similar vigilance levels than adults; whereas, juveniles of the long-tailed finch were less vigilant, possibly because of staying in the family group. Furthermore, both species showed a similar temporal course of vigilance with a fast decrease in vigilance after landing in the tree, which was affected by group size. Single individuals had much higher vigilance than groups of birds. Finally, vigilance was higher at small waterholes. The results show that conspicuousness, uncertainty when arriving at waterholes, and higher perceived risk at small waterholes increased vigilance.

Indexed as

ageantipredator behaviourGouldian finchlong-tailed finchsocial vigilancewaterholes

Identifiers

PMID39858214
PMCPMC11758665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.