Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39858126›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

From Prediction to Precision: Explainable AI-Driven Insights for Targeted Treatment in Equine Colic.

Bekir Cetintav, Ahmet Yalcin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bekir CetintavDepartment of Biostatistics, Veterinary Faculty, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15030 Burdur Merkez, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7251-1211
Ahmet YalcinInstitute of Science, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15030 Burdur Merkez, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0001-6093-8282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colic is a leading cause of mortality in horses, demanding precise and timely interventions. This study integrates machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to predict survival outcomes in horses with colic, using clinical, procedural, and diagnostic data. Random forest and XGBoost emerged as top-performing models, achieving F1 scores of 85.9% and 86.1%, respectively. SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) was employed to provide interpretable insights, offering both global and local explanations for model predictions. The analysis revealed that key features, such as pulse rate, lesion type, and total protein levels, significantly influenced survival likelihood. Local interpretations highlighted the unique contribution of clinical factors to individual cases, enabling personalized insights that guide targeted treatment strategies. These tailored predictions empower veterinarians to prioritize interventions based on the specific conditions of each horse, moving beyond generalized care protocols. By combining predictive accuracy with interpretability, this study advances precision veterinary medicine, enhancing outcomes for equine colic cases and setting a benchmark for future applications of AI in animal health.

Indexed as

equine colicexplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)machine learning in veterinary medicineprecision animal health managementSHAPtargeted veterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID39858126
PMCPMC11758311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.