ArticleCancers2025
Computed Tomography-Image-Based Glioma Grading Using Radiomics and Machine Learning: A Proof-of-Principle Study.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesIn recent years, numerous studies have been published on determining the WHO grade of central nervous system (CNS) tumors using machine learning algorithms. These studies are usually based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sometimes also on positron emission tomography (PET) images. To date, however, there are virtually no corresponding studies based on routinely generated computed tomography (CT) images. The aim of our proof-of-concept study is to investigate whether machine learning-based tumor diagnosis is also possible using CT images.
methodsWe investigate the differentiability of histologically confirmed low-grade and high-grade gliomas. Three conventional machine learning algorithms and a neural net are tested. In addition, we analyze which of the common imaging methods (MRI or CT) appears to be best suited for the diagnostic question under investigation when machine learning algorithms are used. For this purpose, we compare our results based on CT images with numerous studies based on MRI scans.
resultsOur best-performing model includes six features and is obtained using univariate analysis for feature preselection and a Naive Bayes approach for model construction. Using independent test data, this model yields a mean AUC of 0.903, a mean accuracy of 0.839, a mean sensitivity of 0.807 and a mean specificity of 0.864.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that low-grade and high-grade gliomas can be differentiated with high accuracy using machine learning algorithms, not only based on the usual MRI scans, but also based on CT images. In the future, such CT-image-based models can help to further accelerate brain tumor diagnostics and to reduce the number of necessary biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.