ReviewCancers2025
Activation of Genes by Nuclear Receptor/Specificity Protein (Sp) Interactions in Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nur77 agonism invigorates Natural Killer cell immunity against hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Commentary on Dual Orphan Nuclear Receptor 4A1 (NR4A1) and NR4A2 Ligands.Journal of cellular immunology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances (2020-2025) in Estrogen and ER-Positive Breast Cancer: Receptor Signaling, Tumor Microenvironment, Endocrine Therapy Resistance and Innovative Treatment Strategies-A Comprehensive Review.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Orphan nuclear receptor 4A1 (NR4A1) and NR4A2 are endogenous regulators of CD71 and their ligands induce ferroptosis in breast cancer.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Expression of Prooncogenic Nuclear Receptor 4A (NR4A)-Regulated Genes β1-Integrin and G9a Inhibited by Dual NR4A1/2 Ligands.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily consists of 48 genes that are ligand-activated transcription factors that play a key role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and in pathophysiology. NRs are important drug targets for both cancer and non-cancer endpoints as ligands for these receptors can act as agonists, antagonists or inverse agonists to modulate gene expression. With two exceptions, the classical mechanism of action of NRs involves their interactions as monomers, dimers or heterodimers with their cognate response elements (cis-elements) in target gene promoters. Several studies showed that a number of NR-regulated genes did not directly bind their corresponding cis-elements and promoter analysis identified that NR-responsive gene promoters contained GC-rich sequences that bind specificity protein 1 (Sp1), Sp3 and Sp4 transcription factors (TFs). This review is focused on identifying an important sub-set of Sp-regulated genes that are indirectly coregulated through interactions with NRs. Subsequent studies showed that many NRs directly bind Sp1 (or Sp3 and Sp4), the NR/Sp complexes bind GC-rich sites to regulate gene expression and the NR acts as a ligand-modulated nuclear cofactor. In addition, several reports show that NR-responsive genes contain cis-elements that bind both Sp TFs and NRs, and mutation of either cis-element results in loss of NR-responsive (inducible and/or basal). Regulation of these genes involves interactions between DNA-bound Sp TFs with proximal or distal DNA-bound NRs, and, in some cases, other nuclear cofactors are required for gene expression. Thus, many NR-responsive genes are regulated by NR/Sp complexes, and these genes can be targeted by ligands that target NRs and also by drugs that induce degradation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.