ArticleCancers2025
Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Amivantamab-Based Therapies in Patients with Lung Cancer-Provisional Clinical Opinion Based on Existing Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk-adapted first-line therapy selection in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a practical clinical algorithm integrating tumor biology and patient factors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Bispecific Antibodies in Solid Tumors: Advances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improved efficacy has been shown for amivantamab and amivantamab-based combination therapies in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to established treatment options in clinical trials. However, a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed in patients treated with amivantamab-based therapies, with considerable differences in VTE risk according to the line of systemic treatment, concomitant treatment with lazertinib, and intravenous vs. subcutaneous amivantamab administration. Based on early reports of high VTE rates, prophylactic anticoagulation has been implemented in ongoing clinical trials for the first 4 months of amivantamab-lazertinib therapy. However, open questions remain concerning the type, dosing, and duration of primary pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients treated with amivantamab-based therapies. Therefore, the aim of this clinical opinion piece is to provide provisional guidance on how to mitigate VTE risk in patients treated with amivantamab-based therapies following existing clinical practice guidelines on primary thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.