Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39858000›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Incidence and Prevalence of Bone Metastases in Different Solid Tumors Determined by Natural Language Processing of CT Reports.

Niamh Long, David Woodlock, Robert D'Agostino, Gary Nguyen, Natalie Gangai, Varadan Sevilimedu, Richard Kinh Gian Do

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Clinical and geriatric factors associated with fracture risk in older adults with bone metastases: A prospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niamh LongDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
David WoodlockDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Robert D'AgostinoClinical Research Information Technology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Gary NguyenStrategy and Innovation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Natalie GangaiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0603-7165
Varadan SevilimeduBiostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Richard Kinh Gian DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-0310

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesImproved survival due to advances in medical therapy has resulted in increasing numbers of cancer patients living with bone metastases; however, our understanding of the prognostic implications of bone metastases requires larger population-based studies outlining their incidence and prevalence in different primary cancer types, including those with lower incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of bone metastases in solid organ tumors by analyzing reports of staging CT studies with natural language processing (NLP).

methodsIn this retrospective study, 639,470 reports representing 129,326 unique patients were analyzed; 6279 randomly selected reports were manually annotated and labeled for the presence or absence of bone metastases. From these data, a BERT-based NLP model was developed and applied to the patient database. The cumulative incidence at 5 years and prevalence of bone metastases in each cancer type were calculated.

resultsThe accuracy of the NLP model on a validation set was 97.1%, with a positive predictive value (precision) of 88.0% and a sensitivity (recall) of 86.3%. The 5-year incidence rate of bone metastases was highest in prostate, breast, head and neck, and lung cancer (52%, 41%, 36%, 33%). Incidence was lowest in central nervous system cancer and testicular cancer (8%, 5%). Prevalence was highest in prostate, breast, and lung cancer (32%, 25% and 23%), and lowest in central nervous system cancer and testicular cancer (4%, 4%).

conclusionsNLP was utilized to demonstrate patterns of bone metastases in a broad range of cancer types and is a valuable tool in population-based assessment of bone metastases.

Indexed as

bone metastasesnatural language processingoncology

Identifiers

PMID39858000
PMCPMC11763382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.