Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857985›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Current Paradigm and Future Directions in the Management of Nodal Disease in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Elki Sze-Nga Cheung, Philip Yuguang Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elki Sze-Nga CheungDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Philip Yuguang WuDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5106-4087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 36% of patients with cervical cancer present with regional nodal metastasis at diagnosis, which is associated with adverse survival outcomes after definitive treatment. In the modern era of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT), where excellent local control is achieved for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), nodal failure remains a major challenge to cure. To optimize treatment outcomes for node-positive LACC and reduce the incidence of nodal failure, various treatment approaches have been explored, including methods of surgical nodal staging or dissection, RT dose escalation strategies, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to involved nodes, and elective treatment of subclinical para-aortic (PAO) disease. Additionally, there is growing interest in emerging precision RT techniques, such as magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and proton therapy, which may allow for further improvement in the therapeutic ratio. This review outlines the various methods of detection of nodal metastasis, treatment options for node-positive LACC, techniques of nodal radiotherapy and their clinical evidence in efficacy and toxicity profiles. Furthermore, recent advances in systemic therapy and promising novel therapeutic directions that may shape the management of node-positive LACC are discussed.

Indexed as

cervical cancerimmunotherapyintensity-modulated radiotherapynodal controlradiotherapysimultaneous integrated boost

Identifiers

PMID39857985
PMCPMC11764200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.