ArticleCancers2025
Beliefs and Perceptions in Attending the Cervical Screening: The COMUNISS Project Experience.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies highlighted that tailored health communication interventions improve cervical screening participation, vaccination coverage, and awareness about self-sampling benefits. The "COMUNISS" project was aimed at increasing awareness about cervical cancer prevention, identifying barriers to screening, and promoting screening uptake in under-screened women.
methodsA dedicated website with a Q&A session regarding HPV-associated diseases has been set up. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire to gather demographic information, knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer, and attitudes toward screening based on the Health Beliefs Model (HBM). Women can also require a vaginal self-sampling kit at your home to perform the HPV-DNA analysis.
resultsThe website registered over 1000 users over 6 months, and 256 women completed the survey. Nearly half were under-screened. The HBM revealed a high susceptibility and severity perception of diseases, regardless of screening participation, whereas older women declared a high perception of barriers. One-quarter of the women who had requested the self-collection kit returned it for the HPV-DNA testing.
conclusionsThe project found significant gaps in knowledge regarding extra-cervical HPV-related cancers, interpretation of screening results, and effectiveness of self-collection. These findings highlight the need to plan targeted information campaigns to enhance awareness and adherence to screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.