Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857933›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluating Tech Neck: A Pilot Study Using a Self-Developed Questionnaire on Symptoms, Posture, and Preventive Measures.

Brigitte Osser, Csongor Toth, Carmen Delia Nistor-Cseppento, Gyongyi Osser, Caius Calin Miuța, Iosif Ilia, Diana Carina Iovanovici, Cristina Aur, Laura Ioana Bondar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brigitte OsserDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0009-0000-2313-5053
Csongor TothDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Carmen Delia Nistor-CseppentoDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-7180
Gyongyi OsserFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, "Aurel Vlaicu" University of Arad, 310130 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0009-0007-8181-4581
Caius Calin MiuțaFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, "Aurel Vlaicu" University of Arad, 310130 Arad, Romania.
Iosif IliaFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, "Aurel Vlaicu" University of Arad, 310130 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-239X
Diana Carina IovanoviciInstitute of Cardiovascular Diseases Timișoara, Gheorghe Adam Street, No. 13A, 300310 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0135-6861
Cristina AurDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
Laura Ioana BondarDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-0121-9629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMusculoskeletal symptoms, such as neck pain, back pain, and eye strain, are prevalent in modern work environments, particularly among individuals engaged in prolonged sitting and repetitive tasks. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of these symptoms and the impact of ergonomic tool usage, break frequency, posture awareness, and proactive measures on symptom intensity and daily functioning.

methodsThis cross-sectional pilot study used a self-developed questionnaire to assess the prevalence and intensity of musculoskeletal symptoms among participants aged 6-18 years. The survey collected data on ergonomic tool usage, break frequency, posture awareness, and proactive measures (such as taking breaks and seeking professional help). Symptom intensity was assessed across common musculoskeletal issues. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, ANOVA, and Spearman's correlation, were used to identify significant correlations and associations between variables.

resultsA significant proportion of participants reported moderate to severe symptoms, including neck pain, back pain, and eye strain. Participants who used ergonomic tools reported significantly lower symptom intensity (<0.001). A positive correlation was found between fewer breaks and higher symptom intensity (r = 0.908,

conclusionsThe study highlights the significant role of ergonomic tools, posture awareness, and regular breaks in mitigating musculoskeletal symptoms. Proactive measures, including structured interventions, can effectively reduce symptom intensity and improve daily functioning. These findings suggest that workplace health strategies focusing on ergonomics and posture education are crucial for reducing the impact of musculoskeletal discomfort on employee well-being and productivity.

Indexed as

break frequencyergonomic toolsmeasures takenneck painposture awarenesssymptom intensitytech neckwrist pain

Identifiers

PMID39857933
PMCPMC11764141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.