ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Foreign Bodies in Lower Airway in Children: Brief Review and Clinical Experience.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laryngeal Eggshell Foreign Body Mimicking Persistent Laryngitis: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Predictors of Positive Bronchoscopy in Children with Suspected Foreign Body Aspiration: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure from Foreign Body Aspiration in a 16-Month-Old: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of CXR and CT in Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration: A PICU-Based Bronchoscopy Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Negative Bronchoscopy or Computed Tomography Radiation in Children with Suspected Foreign Body Aspiration? Pros and Cons.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForeign body aspiration is a preventable occurrence that carries a high risk of mortality in the pediatric population. Clinically, foreign body aspiration manifests as cough, followed by choking, which might not be given any consideration by the caregivers of the child. An episode of sudden wheezing can also raise the suspicion of a foreign body in the lower respiratory tract. The clinical findings depend on the type, size, and localization of the foreign body and include persistent cough, localized airway resistance, localized or diffuse wheezing, and difficulty breathing. A bronchoscopy is the procedure of choice for the removal of foreign bodies. Flexible bronchoscopy is increasingly being used as the initial diagnostic procedure in children with an uncertain history of choking, in the absence of physical and radiological lung changes, and in chronic complaints requiring the exclusion of a foreign body in the airways. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe our clinical experience with lower respiratory tract foreign body extraction in children over a period of five years. MATERIALS AND
methodsOver a 5-year period, 154 patients under the age of 18 underwent a bronchoscopy due to a suspected foreign body in the lower respiratory tract. Of these patients, 92% had an incident leading to acute respiratory distress, and 8% had no definite data on such an event in the anamnesis.
resultsA foreign body in the respiratory tract was found in and extracted from 50 patients, and foreign bodies were absent in 104 of the cases.
conclusionsIf a foreign body enters the lower respiratory tract, immediate and adequate actions are required to solve the problem. A bronchoscopy should be conducted in every suspected case of foreign body aspiration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.