ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Physical Literacy, According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in an Italian Preschool and Education for a Daily Movement Routine.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Activity, Self-Administered Motor Tests, and Academic Achievement in Lower Secondary School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Motor Competence of Learning with a Perception-Awareness Approach: A Pilot Study in the Formal Learning Environment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Physical Development and Postural Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Ecological Dynamics Approach in Physical Education on Physical Fitness and Types of Physical Activity in Middle School Students: An Exploratory Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Knowledge of Physical Activity Guidelines and Its Association with Meeting Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Recommendations in Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe preschool context produces excessive sedentary behavior in children. The systematic fulfillment of structured physical activities during school time, namely a daily movement routine (DMR), can contribute to increasing the quantity of physical activity (PA) and to improving physical literacy (PL), reaching the WHO's recommendations.
aimThe present study aims to quantify the sedentary time spent by 4- and 5-year-old preschool children and to verify the effects that a DMR could have on sedentary habits in preschool children.
methodAn experimental observational study was carried out. Ad hoc questionnaires were administered to parents, teachers, and children, and an observation checklist was used to quantify the time spent in sedentary activities at school. Descriptive statistics and
resultsThirty-two children attending Italian preschool participated in this study. The implementation of a DMR significantly reduced the sedentary time in preschool, decreasing the time spent sitting by 45.69% and increasing the time spent standing by 185%.
conclusionsThis study confirms the hypothesis that children move for less time than recommended by the WHO and highlights the importance of making the experiences of the DMR structural, as this could be an opportunity for educational processes to enhance active lifestyles in promoting the development of physical literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.