Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857526›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Mobilising Cross-Sectoral Collaboration in Creating Age-Friendly Cities: Case Studies from Akita and Manchester.

Patty Doran, Sophie Yarker, Tine Buffel, Hisami Satake, Fumito Watanabe, Minoru Kimoto, Ayuto Kodama, Yu Kume, Keiko Suzuki, Sachiko Makabe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patty DoranSociology Department, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-5771
Sophie YarkerHealth Geography, School of Science, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK.
Tine BuffelSociology Department, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3780-1103
Hisami SatakeALL-A Co., Ltd., Akita 010-0976, Japan.
Fumito WatanabeALL-A Co., Ltd., Akita 010-0976, Japan.
Minoru KimotoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita 010-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4705-2361
Ayuto KodamaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita 010-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2583-9422
Yu KumeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita 010-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-1082
Keiko SuzukiDepartment of Nursing, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita 010-8502, Japan.
Sachiko MakabeDepartment of Nursing, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita 010-8502, Japan.
Hidetaka OtaAdvanced Research Center for Geriatric and Gerontology (ARGG), Akita University, Akita 010-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4815-3711

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RL 2019 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities (AFCCs) is an increasingly popular policy response to supporting ageing populations. AFCC programmes rely on cross-sectoral collaboration, involving partnerships among diverse stakeholders working across sectors to address shared goals. However, there remains a limited understanding of what mechanisms and strategies drive collaboration among diverse actors within age-friendly cities. To address this gap, this empirical paper draws on examples from a comparative case study across Akita (Japan) and Manchester (UK), two cities with distinct demographic profiles but both with a longstanding commitment to the age-friendly approach. Case studies were created through a range of data collection methods, namely, a review of secondary data sources, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, and fieldwork in each city. Key insights from the case studies relating to the mobilisation of cross-sectoral collaboration were categorised into three themes: leadership and influencing, co-production, and place-based working. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive; collaboration building through co-production and place-based working is essential to deliver age-friendly programmes, but these mechanisms rely on leadership and influence. Therefore, it is recommended that all three mechanisms be used to effectively mobilise cross-sectoral collaborations to collectively create AFCC and support healthy ageing.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealthy AgingAgedCitiesHumansJapanUnited Kingdomage-friendlyageingcase studyco-productioncross-sectoral collaborationleadershipolder people

Identifiers

PMID39857526
PMCPMC11764577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.