ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Cumulative Exposure to Unconventional Natural Gas Development and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Registry-Based Case-Control Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal residential proximity to oil and gas development in California and the risk of childhood cancer.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026Article
- Residential proximity to active and abandoned oil and gas development and risk of childhood Ewing sarcoma in California.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid growth of unconventional natural gas development (UNGD), also known as hydraulic fracturing, has raised concerns of potential exposures to hazardous chemicals. Few studies have examined the risk of childhood cancer from exposure to UNGD. A case-control study included 498 children diagnosed with leukemia, lymphoma, central nervous system neoplasms, and malignant bone tumors during the period 2010-2019 identified through the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. Cases were matched to controls using Pennsylvania birth records. For each subject, a new overall UNGD exposure metric was calculated which incorporates both spatial (proximity) and temporal (duration) aspects of well activity. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk of combined and individual cancers by overall UNGD exposure, and well proximity. Children with a higher overall UNGD exposure (3rd/4th quartiles) had an increased risk for the four malignancies combined [OR] 1.69 (95% CI 1.01, 2.82) and 1.79 (95% CI 1.00, 3.19) compared to non-exposed children. Overall, individuals living within 0.5 miles of a UNGD site were 3.94 times (95% CI 1.66, 9.30) more likely to develop a malignancy compared to non-exposed children and the risk of lymphoma within 0.5 miles and 0.5-1 miles was also elevated [ORs of 5.05 (95% CI 1.09, 23.39) and 7.71 (95% CI 1.01, 59.00), respectively] compared to non-exposed. Our study found that overall UNGD cumulative activity as well as a proximity to UNGD wells were associated with an increased risk of childhood lymphoma and overall childhood cancers combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.