Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857508›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

The Neural Correlates of Body Image Processing in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies.

Lara Norrlin, Oliver Baumann

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara NorrlinSchool of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.
Oliver BaumannSchool of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3976-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body image concerns are key prognostic and pathogenic factors of anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). This study aimed to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying body image perception across its two domains of estimation and satisfaction in anorexia and bulimia patients and healthy controls (HC). Systematic searches were conducted across eight databases, including PubMed; Cochrane Library; Ovid; Google Scholar; Sage Journals; Scopus; PsycInfo; and ScienceDirect, from database inception until the 23rd of April 2023. The sample pertained to 14 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies and 556 participants, with tasks primarily including image and silhouette-based body estimation and satisfaction paradigms. ALE meta-analysis was conducted to investigate significant clusters of activation foci across the different studies. Shared activations were observed between HC, AN, and BN patients in cortical regions related to object manipulation and recognition, visuospatial awareness, and memory and negative affect regulation. Differential activation in interoceptive and higher-order cognitive or affective control regions likely hold the key to pathological body distortion. This study outlined commonalities and differences in the correlates driving healthy body mapping and eating disorder pathology. Our findings provide pertinent implications for future research, current clinical interventions, and therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBody ImageBrainBulimia NervosaHumansLikelihood FunctionsMagnetic Resonance Imaginganorexia nervosabody imagebulimia nervosaeating disorderfMRI

Identifiers

PMID39857508
PMCPMC11764578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.