ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024
Waste and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Produced from Ophthalmic Surgeries: A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate-Conscious Glaucoma Care: Strategies to Minimize the Environmental Impact in the Operating Room and in the Clinic.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- From Innovation to Conservation: Sustainable Pathways in Vitreoretinal Practice.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Real and perceived barriers to effective use of cataract surgical supplies.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
- EyeSustain: Pioneering specialty-specific sustainability.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Healthcare is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially within the surgical suite. Ophthalmologists play a role, since they frequently perform high-volume procedures, such as cataract surgery. This review aims to summarize the current literature on surgical waste and GHG emissions in ophthalmology and proposes a framework to standardize future studies. (2) Methods: Protocol and reporting methods were based on PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. Articles that reported any quantitative measurement of waste or GHGs produced from ophthalmic surgeries were eligible for inclusion. Commentaries, opinion papers, reviews and articles in a non-English language were excluded. (3) Results: A total of 713 articles were reviewed, with 10 articles found to meet inclusion criteria. Six studies produced level 3 evidence, two level 4 evidence, and one level 5 evidence. According to studies, most of the GHGs came from procurement of surgical materials, followed by travel emissions and building energy. (4) Conclusions: Research on waste and GHGs produced in ophthalmic surgery is limited, and existing studies utilize varied approaches to quantify this waste. We propose a standardized waste-lifecycle framework for researchers to organize future research. Such standardization will help in comparing studies and may uncover more opportunities to implement impactful waste reduction strategies in ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.