ArticleBiology2025
Parameterization of the Differences in Neural Oscillations Recorded by Wearable Magnetoencephalography for Chinese Semantic Cognition.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural oscillations observed during semantic processing embody the function of brain language processing. Precise parameterization of the differences in these oscillations across various semantics from a time-frequency perspective is pivotal for elucidating the mechanisms of brain language processing. The superlet transform and cluster depth test were used to compute the time-frequency representation of oscillatory difference (ODTFR) between neural activities recorded by optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG) during processing congruent and incongruent Chinese semantics. Subsequently, ODTFR was parameterized based on the definition of local events. Finally, this study calculated the specific time-frequency values at which oscillation differences occurred in multiple auditory-language-processing regions. It was found that these oscillatory differences appeared in most regions and were mainly concentrated in the beta band. The average peak frequency of these oscillatory differences was 15.7 Hz, and the average peak time was 457 ms. These findings offer a fresh perspective on the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of distinct Chinese semantics and provide references and insights for analyzing language-related brain activities recorded by OPM-MEG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.