Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857299›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

MeStanG-Resource for High-Throughput Sequencing Standard Data Sets Generation for Bioinformatic Methods Evaluation and Validation.

Daniel Ramos Lopez, Francisco J Flores, Andres S Espindola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Ramos LopezInstitute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics (IBMF), Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3486-1947
Francisco J FloresDepartamento de Ciencias de la Vida y la Agricultura, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-3750
Andres S EspindolaInstitute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics (IBMF), Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-0673

Funding

Oklahoma State University - Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station OKL03271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics analysis has enabled the measurement of the microbiome diversity in environmental samples without prior targeted enrichment. Functional and phylogenetic studies based on microbial diversity retrieved using HTS platforms have advanced from detecting known organisms and discovering unknown species to applications in disease diagnostics. Robust validation processes are essential for test reliability, requiring standard samples and databases deriving from real samples and in silico generated artificial controls. We propose a MeStanG as a resource for generating HTS Nanopore data sets to evaluate present and emerging bioinformatics pipelines. MeStanG allows samples to be designed with user-defined organism abundances expressed as number of reads, reference sequences, and predetermined or custom errors by sequencing profiles. The simulator pipeline was evaluated by analyzing its output mock metagenomic samples containing known read abundances using read mapping, genome assembly, and taxonomic classification on three scenarios: a bacterial community composed of nine different organisms, samples resembling pathogen-infected wheat plants, and a viral pathogen serial dilution sampling. The evaluation was able to report consistently the same organisms, and their read abundances as provided in the mock metagenomic sample design. Based on this performance and its novel capacity of generating exact number of reads, MeStanG can be used by scientists to develop mock metagenomic samples (artificial HTS data sets) to assess the diagnostic performance metrics of bioinformatic pipelines, allowing the user to choose predetermined or customized models for research and training.

Indexed as

bioinformaticshigh-throughput sequencingmetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID39857299
PMCPMC11762867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.