Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857208›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis and Screening Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.

Lucrezia Giorgi, Domiziana Nardelli, Antonio Moffa, Francesco Iafrati, Simone Di Giovanni, Ewa Olszewska, Peter Baptista, Lorenzo Sabatino, Manuele Casale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in surgical planning and outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnea: emerging hype or the future standard?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucrezia GiorgiIntegrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Domiziana NardelliSchool of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Antonio MoffaIntegrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Francesco IafratiIntegrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-6707
Simone Di GiovanniIntegrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Ewa OlszewskaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Sleep Apnea Surgery Center, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9993-9266
Peter BaptistaENT Department, Al Zahra Private Hospital Dubai, Dubai 23614, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-5331
Lorenzo SabatinoIntegrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Manuele CasaleIntegrated Therapies in Otolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed condition associated with a major healthcare burden. Current diagnostic tools, such as full-night polysomnography (PSG), pose a limited accessibility to diagnosis due to their elevated costs. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Machine Learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, offer novel potential tools for an accurate OSA screening and diagnosis. This systematic review evaluates articles employing AI-powered models for OSA screening and diagnosis in the last decade.

methodsA comprehensive electronic search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. The included studies were original articles written in English, reporting the use of ML algorithms to diagnose and predict OSA in suspected patients. The last search was performed in June 2024. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42024563059).

resultsSixty-five articles, involving data from 109,046 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the algorithms, outcomes were analyzed into six sections (anthropometric indexes, imaging, electrocardiographic signals, respiratory signals, and oximetry and miscellaneous signals). AI algorithms demonstrated significant improvements in OSA detection, with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity often exceeding traditional tools. In particular, anthropometric indexes were most widely used, especially in logistic regression-powered algorithms.

conclusionsThe application of AI algorithms to OSA diagnosis and screening has great potential to improve patient outcomes, increase early detection, and lessen the load on healthcare systems. However, rigorous validation and standardization efforts must be made to standardize datasets.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnosisOSAscreening

Identifiers

PMID39857208
PMCPMC11764519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.