ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Safety Profile of Inclisiran in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInclisiran is a novel drug that employs ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference to lower the levels of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein. It has demonstrated a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol levels compared to a placebo. We aim to comprehensively evaluate the safety of using Inclisiran in patients with dyslipidemia and ASCVD or an ASCVD risk equivalent.
methodsFour electronic databases, namely, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched from inception to June 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety profiles of Inclisiran and the control group. The outcomes investigated were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), injection-site adverse events, new-onset or worsening type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and nasopharyngitis. The effect estimates of outcomes were assessed using the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the restricted maximum likelihood method. Subgroup analysis was performed based on different dosing regimens.
resultsThe study included 7 RCTs, enrolling 4790 patients (age 63.8 ± 9.7 years, 33.2% females) who received Inclisiran. Compared to the control group, Inclisiran use did not yield a significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.54; I
conclusionsInclisiran use significantly increased injection-site reactions, with no increase in mortality, T2DM, or nasopharyngitis. It demonstrates a generally favorable safety profile, making it a promising option for lipid management in individuals at high cardiovascular risk, such as those with ASCVD or equivalent conditions. While it effectively improves dyslipidemia, decision-makers should be aware of an increased incidence of injection-site reactions, which, though typically mild, warrant consideration in clinical practice. Further trials are required to assess the safety of Inclisiran, particularly the association of the severity of injection-site adverse events over longer treatment durations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.