Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39857126›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Penetrating Orbital Injury: A Narrative Review for Emergency Clinicians.

Florence Pirlet, Julien Flament

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florence PirletEmergency Department, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5630-4853
Julien FlamentEmergency Department, CHU UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penetrating orbit injury is a rare but complex and life-threatening occurrence that may easily be overlooked. Management in the emergency department requires an early multidisciplinary approach but still lacks standard guidelines. This narrative review aims to provide a systematic approach to the management of penetrating orbital injuries for emergency clinicians. Mortality and morbidity are significant due to the orbit's proximity to numerous anatomical structures. Complications may be infectious, ocular, or cerebro-vascular. Their incidence depends on the mechanism of injury, entry point, and object's characteristics such as its shape, composition, and velocity. Non-occult cases are often associated with medial orbital rim or medial eyelid penetration, whereas occult cases mainly present with trivial lateral eyelid injury and could be overlooked. Radiological workup consists of computed tomography or magnetic resonance according to the object's composition. Treatment in the emergency department focuses on initial resuscitation, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and tetanus immunization. Subsequently, early removal of the foreign object in a controlled environment and other specific treatments must be discussed with a multidisciplinary team. Penetrating orbital injury is an uncommon but complex type of head trauma that may be challenging to diagnose. Systematic and multidisciplinary management in the emergency department is crucial to improve overall prognosis.

Indexed as

eyelid injuryoccult injuryorbital rimpenetrating orbital injurytraumatology

Identifiers

PMID39857126
PMCPMC11765369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.