ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Sensory Attributes in Spinach- and Offals-Filled Chicken Roulades: An Empirical Analysis.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteolytic Tenderization of Pork Loin with Papain and Bromelain and Its Physicochemical and Sensory Effects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Incorporation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Characterization of Meat-Based Pasta Enriched with Apple and Sugar Beet Fibers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dietary Fibres in Processed Meat: A Review on Nutritional Enhancement, Technological Effects, Sensory Implications and Consumer Perception.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most significant industries in the world is the meat sector, and development into new goods is ongoing due to high customer demand and fierce market competition. Products made from chicken are widely favored. This phenomenon can be attributed to the lack of cultural or religious restrictions on this meat. The study looks into how using two distinct types of iron-rich fillings impacts the sensory profile of classic chicken roulades. The purpose of the study is to determine how changes in sensory qualities (such as taste, texture, and flavor) affect product acceptance among customers. This approach uses methods like check-all-that-apply (CATA), principal component analysis (PCA), external preference mapping (PrefMap), and penalty analysis to explore the impact of adding chicken offals and spinach as fillings on the sensory profile of traditional chicken meat roulades. This approach seeks to expand the meat product category, create new goods that use both plant and animal components, invent new ways to use offals and spinach in the market, and ensure that consumers accept these new products. Based on the results of our investigation, the type of filling utilized in the roulades showed the most differences across all sensory tests. According to hedonic analysis and preference mapping (PrefMap), the majority of customers favored roulades with spinach fillings as opposed to those containing chicken offals, which only a small portion of customers liked. Variations in consumer preference for roulades filled with chicken offals were noted in the anatomical region, with slightly greater preference for roulades made from chicken breast. However, this (anatomical region used) did not significantly affect the outcomes of all sensory tests. The spinach stuffing was found to be quite popular with the customers, even outperforming traditional chicken roulades, making it the most significant influence. Based on consumer appreciation, this suggests that the spinach-filled chicken roulades may be a viable option for meat products in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.