ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Classifying Food Items During an Eating Occasion: A Machine Learning Approach with Slope Dynamics for Windowed Kinetic Data.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recognition of eating episodes via commercial smartwatch sensors analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWearable devices equipped with a range of sensors have emerged as promising tools for monitoring and improving individuals' health and lifestyle.
objectivesContribute to the investigation and development of effective and reliable methods for dietary monitoring based on raw kinetic data generated by wearable devices.
methodsThis study uses resources from the NOTION study. A total of 20 healthy subjects (9 women and 11 men, aged 20-31 years) were equipped with two commercial smartwatches during four eating occasions under semi-naturalistic conditions. All meals were video-recorded, and acceleration data were extracted and analyzed. Food recognition on these features was performed using random forest (RF) models with 5-fold cross-validation. The performance of the classifiers was expressed in out-of-bag sensitivity and specificity.
resultsAcceleration along the x-axis and power show the highest and lowest rates of median variable importance, respectively. Increasing the window size from 1 to 5 s leads to a gain in performance for almost all food items. The RF classifier reaches the highest performance in identifying meatballs (89.4% sensitivity and 81.6% specificity) and the lowest in identifying sandwiches (74.6% sensitivity and 72.5% specificity).
conclusionsMonitoring food items using simple wristband-mounted wearable devices is feasible and accurate for some foods while unsatisfactory for others. Machine learning tools are necessary to deal with the complexity of signals gathered by the devices, and research is ongoing to improve accuracy further and work on large-scale and real-time implementation and testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.