Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856905›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Foodborne Event Detection Based on Social Media Mining: A Systematic Review.

Silvano Salaris, Honoria Ocagli, Alessandra Casamento, Corrado Lanera, Dario Gregori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silvano SalarisUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8389-7460
Honoria OcagliUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-1659
Alessandra CasamentoUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6156-9020
Corrado LaneraUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-7428
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7906-0580

Funding

PON "Research and Innovation" 2014-2020 The research project was financed with the allocated fund from the PON "Research and Innovation" 2014-2020, Action IV.6 "Research contracts on Green topics."
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne illnesses represent a significant global health challenge, causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Conventional surveillance methods, such as laboratory-based reporting and physician notifications, often fail to enable early detection, prompting the exploration of innovative solutions. Social media platforms, combined with machine learning (ML), offer new opportunities for real-time monitoring and outbreak analysis. This systematic review evaluated the role of social networks in detecting and managing foodborne illnesses, particularly through the use of ML techniques to identify unreported events and enhance outbreak response. This review analyzed studies published up to December 2024 that utilized social media data and data mining to predict and prevent foodborne diseases. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Arxiv, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, excluding clinical trials, case reports, and reviews. Two independent reviewers screened studies using Covidence, with a third resolving conflicts. Study variables included social media platforms, ML techniques (shallow and deep learning), and model performance, with a risk of bias assessed using the PROBAST tool. The results highlighted Twitter and Yelp as primary data sources, with shallow learning models dominating the field. Many studies were identified as having high or unclear risk of bias. This review underscored the potential of social media and ML in foodborne disease surveillance and emphasizes the need for standardized methodologies and further exploration of deep learning models.

Indexed as

foodborne illnessmachine learningsocial mediasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39856905
PMCPMC11764790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.