ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Foodborne Event Detection Based on Social Media Mining: A Systematic Review.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Foodborne Pathogen Detection from Sensing to Food Safety Systems: A Systematic Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Statistical and Machine-Learning Approaches forMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Temporal Association Between ChatGPT-Generated Diarrhea Synonyms in Internet Search Queries and Emergency Department Visits for Diarrhea-Related Symptoms in South Korea: Exploratory Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based DNA microarray analysis for disease detection using the MICRO-AI framework.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foodborne illnesses represent a significant global health challenge, causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Conventional surveillance methods, such as laboratory-based reporting and physician notifications, often fail to enable early detection, prompting the exploration of innovative solutions. Social media platforms, combined with machine learning (ML), offer new opportunities for real-time monitoring and outbreak analysis. This systematic review evaluated the role of social networks in detecting and managing foodborne illnesses, particularly through the use of ML techniques to identify unreported events and enhance outbreak response. This review analyzed studies published up to December 2024 that utilized social media data and data mining to predict and prevent foodborne diseases. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Arxiv, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, excluding clinical trials, case reports, and reviews. Two independent reviewers screened studies using Covidence, with a third resolving conflicts. Study variables included social media platforms, ML techniques (shallow and deep learning), and model performance, with a risk of bias assessed using the PROBAST tool. The results highlighted Twitter and Yelp as primary data sources, with shallow learning models dominating the field. Many studies were identified as having high or unclear risk of bias. This review underscored the potential of social media and ML in foodborne disease surveillance and emphasizes the need for standardized methodologies and further exploration of deep learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.