Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856828›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Quality Preservation and Shelf-Life Extension of Prickly Pear (

Carolina Rodrigues, Cariny Polesca, Isabela Bicalho, Victor Gomes Lauriano Souza, Isabel Coelhoso, Ana Luísa Fernando

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolina RodriguesMEtRICs, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology (NOVA FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8136-3385
Cariny PolescaMEtRICs, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology (NOVA FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Isabela BicalhoMEtRICs, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology (NOVA FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Victor Gomes Lauriano SouzaMEtRICs, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology (NOVA FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8381-9780
Isabel CoelhosoLAQV-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology (NOVA FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-3436
Ana Luísa FernandoMEtRICs, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology (NOVA FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-3982

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia 2020.04441.BDFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04077/2020 and UIDP/04077/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50006/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prickly pear consumption is increasing across the world due to its rich variety of nutrients and bioactive compounds. Yet, it is a seasonal and highly perishable fruit, and the application of edible coatings emerges as an alternative to extend its shelf life. In this work, the effects of alginate, starch, chitosan, and pectin as coatings on the physicochemical, bioactive, microbiological, and textural properties of two prickly pear varieties (orange and red), kept under refrigeration (5 ± 2 °C) were evaluated for 6 weeks. Coatings proved to be helpful in the maintenance of the fruits' color and textural properties, especially when pectin was applied. Overall, starch and chitosan can be considered the most effective coatings in preserving the quality of prickly pears among the options studied. A lower weight loss (8-10%) in fruits was achieved when starch and chitosan were applied, while in control fruits (without coating), the loss was 18-23%. Starch and chitosan also contributed to preserving the bioactivity of red fruits and showed good results in the preservation of total phenolic content in the orange fruits. In addition, starch and chitosan coatings also presented the best performance for the reduction of microbial contamination (both yeasts and molds and total mesophilic aerobic microorganisms). These findings highlight the role of edible coatings in preserving prickly pears, for a longer period, meeting consumers' demand for fresh fruit.

Indexed as

edible coatingsprickly pearsquality preservationshelf life

Identifiers

PMID39856828
PMCPMC11765136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.