ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
On the Concepts, Methods, and Use of "Probability of Success" for Drug Development Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deconvoluting Gut Versus Liver Cytochrome P450 3A4 Function: Drug Probes, Biomarkers, and Tissue Biopsy.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug development is a lengthy process with considerable uncertainty at each milestone. Several trials are needed to progress to confirmatory evaluation and establish a positive benefit-risk balance. One of the critical milestones is the decision to progress to phase III based on phase II trial results. Use of probability of success is becoming standard in pharmaceutical companies to support this decision. However, the lack of consistency in terminology makes it difficult to assess the comparative value of different approaches. By leveraging the availability of high-quality external data (e.g., real-world data, historical clinical trial data, etc.), probability of success-based procedures may further improve decision-making. We performed a scoping review of approaches to calculate the probability of success of a phase III trial depending on the available data sources and the availability of specific endpoints. Calculation of probability of success is relatively straightforward if data for the primary endpoint of the phase III trial are also available in phase II trials. Often, phase II trials are based on biomarker or surrogate outcomes, due to challenges associated with study duration and required sample size. Probability of success-based procedures as reviewed can incorporate external data sources, for example, from clinical trials testing the same or similar drug or real-world data on the targeted population-optimizing the calculation of probability of trial success and the projected drug candidate value. We conclude the paper by reflecting on alternative approaches and ideas for uses within pharmaceutical companies and academia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.