ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Parental perception of treatment options for mucopolysaccharidosis: a survey to bridge the gap for personalized medicine.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-driven surveys of mucopolysaccharidoses revealed patient-reported outcomes in the Japan MPS patient and family group.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage diseases with substantial unmet medical needs-for both patients and caregivers. Approved therapies are limited, and the perception of investigative ones remains enigmatic.
methodUsing an innovative survey concept based on the discrete choice experiment method (DEC) with neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic patient scenarios, we aimed to evaluate how parents of children with MPS perceive different approved and innovative therapies. The questionnaire was distributed via patient organizations in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.
resultsMost likely parents would choose an approach to repurposed treatments for their child (neuronopathic: 82%, 14/17 and non-neuronopathic: 94%, 16/17), followed by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT, both 88%, 15/17), hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT, 70%, 12/17 and 76%, 13/17), and finally gene therapy (GT, 58%, 10/17 and 53%, 9/17). The general attitudes strongly influenced decision-making regarding treatment options. While over 80% of respondents who held a positive attitude toward ERT, HSCT, and ITTs indicated they would opt for these therapies in both neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic cases, only about half of the parents with a favorable general view of gene therapy (GT) expressed a positive perception of its likelihood as a treatment option. Furthermore, most parents found mild infections, injection site reactions (ISRs), hypertonia, and treatment-related hospitalizations acceptable and indicated patient organizations as their main source of information.
conclusionsThis study provides an innovative survey method, thereby offering the rationale for a quantitative risk-benefit model and the importance of patient and caregiver-centered information dissemination, especially for innovative therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.