ArticleBMC oral health2025
Evaluation of stress patterns in teeth with endodontic treatment and periapical lesions as abutments for fixed prosthesis: a finite element analysis study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of proximal box depth associated with deep margin elevation and restorative materials on fracture resistance and repairability of endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of simulated root canal morphology and post space depth on fracture performance of glass fiber-reinforced post-core buildups.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Characterization of a new shape memory composite material for orthodontic aligners - a preliminary study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExamining stress distributions in abutment teeth with periapical lesions is essential for understanding their biomechanical impact on dental structures and tissues. This study uses finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate these stress patterns under occlusal forces, aiming to enhance treatment strategies and prosthetic designs.
methodsThree FEA models were created: a healthy mandibular premolar (Model 1), a premolar with a single crown and a lesion repaired using a fiber-post (Model 2), and 3) a premolar with a lesion repaired using fiber-post to support a four-member bridge (Model 3). A 300 N occlusal static stress was given to each model at a 45° angle to the long axis of the tooth, namely at the lingual inclination of the buccal-cusp. Deformation behaviour and maximum equivalent stress distributions were simulated on the all components, including the bony structure for each model.
resultsThe study showed a reduction in equivalent stress levels in trabecular and cortical bone, crown, cementum, and PDL under occlusal force, from Model 1 to Model 3. The Von Mises yield criteria values of the tooth models differed depending on the prosthetic restorations, with the highest value seen in Model 2 (133.87 MPa). Similar locations in all models showed concentrated equivalent stresses for all components. The periapical lesion area exhibited relatively low stress values for Models 2 and 3, at 0.061 MPa and 0.039 MPa, respectively. The largest level of stress was seen in the cervicobuccal areas of the tooth in all models.
conclusionProsthetic restorations on teeth with periapical lesions resulted in varying stress and biomechanical responses in the tooth and surrounding bone tissue. These teeth can serve as abutments in a four-unit bridge when subjected to optimal occlusal stresses, based on the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.